The Ethnogenesis Myths of the Nahuas of the Basin of Mexico and Tlaxcala as Ethnopolitical Sources

The Nahua is one of largest indigenous ethnolinguistic entities of the cultural area of Mesoamerica, a center of origin and evolution of early states which is isolated from the Old World. Today they live predominantly in mountain areas of the Central Plateau and southern region of the Sierra Madre Occidental and the Sierra Madre Oriental in Mexico. Few Nahua groups currently inhabit the Central American countries of Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica. This article examines the origin myths of three large Nahua ethnic groups of Central Mexico before the Spanish Conquest. These groups are the Aztecs or Mexica, one of the founders of the Triple Alliance confederation, frequently and erroneously called the «Aztec empire»; the Chalca, the inhabitants of the south-eastern part of the Basin of Mexico, and the Tlaxcaltecas, the residents of the present-day State of Tlaxcala in the eastern part of the Central Plateau. This approach permits conducting a comparative analysis of the narratives of ethnic groups that have common origin but different identity and cultural traditions, as well as to detect basic elements concerning Nahua migrations to Central Mexico, their relations with the autochthonous population and the foundation of their proper states and dynasties in the Late Postclassic Period, that is in the 13–16^th centuries. The aim of this article is the analysis of the ethnogenesis myths of the Aztecs, the Chalca and the Tlaxcaltecas as an ethnopolitical source, which allows to reconstruct the early stage of their history, the main sociopolitical institutions, their ethnic identity and notions about power and forms of its legitimization before the Spanish Conquest.

1. Калюта А.В. (2023) Ацтекская «империя» и общественный строй науа глазами российских историков, этнографов и археологов, Ибероамериканские тетради, № 4, с. 62–87. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2023-11-4-62-87

2. Kalyuta A.V. (2023) Atstekskaya «imperiya» i obshchestvennyi stroi naua glazami rossiiskikh istorikov, etnografov i arkheologov [The «Aztec Empire» and Nahua (Aztec) Socio-Political Organization Through the Eyes of Russian Historians, Ethnologists and Archeologists], Iberoamerican Papers, no. 4, pp. 62–87. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2023-11-4-62-87 (In Russian)

3. Кинжалов Р.В. (1993) Пополь-Вух. Родословная владык Тотоникапана, Москва, Наука, Ладомир, 252 с.

4. Kinzhalov R.V. (1993) Popol’-Vuh. Rodoslovnaja vladyk Totonikapana [Popol Vuh. Ancestry of the Lords of Totonicapan], Moscow, Nauka, Ladomir, 252 p. (In Russian)

5. Alvarado Tezozomoc H. (2001) Crónica mexicana [Mexican chronicle], Madrid, Dastin Historia, 576 p. (In Spanish)

6. Alvarado Tezozomoc H. (2012) Crónica Mexicayotl. En Tres crónicas mexicanas. Textos recopilados por Domingo Chimalpáhin [Mexica Cronicle. In Tres Mexican chronicles. Texts collected by Domingo Chimalpáhin], México, Cien de México, pp. 25–157. (In Nahuatl)

7. Bandelier A.F. (1878) On the Distribution and Tenure of Lands and Customs with Respect to Inheritance among the Ancient Mexicans, Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. XII Annual Report, Cambridge, Harvard University, pp. 385–448.

8. Bierhorst J. (ed.) (1992) History and Mythology of the Aztecs. The Codex Chimalpopoca, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, 238 p.

9. Bierhorst J. (ed.) (2011) Codex Chimalpopoca: The Text in Nahuatl with a Glossary and Grammatical Notes, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, 210 p.

10. Calnek E.E. (1978) The City-State in the Basin of Mexico. Late Prehispanic Period, in R.P. Schaedel, J.E. Hardoy, N. Scott-Kinze Urbanization in the Americas from its Beginnings to Present, Mouton, De Gruyter, pp. 315–327.

11. Carrasco P. (1964) The Family Structure of the 16th Century Tepoztlan, in R.A. Manners (ed.) Process and Pattern in Culture: Essays in Honor of Julian Steward, Chicago, Routledge, pp. 185–210.

12. Cortés H. (2007) Cartas de relación [Letters of Relation], México, Editorial Porrúa, 399 p. (In Spanish)

13. Chimalpáhin Quauhtlehuanitzin D.F. (1998) Las ocho relaciones y el Memorial de Culhuacan [The Eight Relaciones and Memorial of Culhucan], México, Cien de México, 435 p. (In Nahuatl and Spanish)

14. Chimalpáhin Quauhtlehuanitzin D.F. (2001) Diario [Diary], México, Cien de México, 427 p. (In Nahuatl and Spanish)

15. García Icazbalceta J. (ed.) (1891) Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas [History of Mexicans by their Paintings in New Collection of Documents for History of Mexico] Nueva colección de documentos para historia de México [New collection of documents on Mexican history], vol. 3. México, pp. 228–263. (In Spanish)

16. Gillespie S.D. (2007) Toltecs, Tula and Chichen Itza. The Development of Archeological Myth in J.K. Kowalsky, C. Kristan-Graham (eds.) Twin Tollans. Chichén Itzá, Tula, and the Epiclassic to Early Postclassic Mesoamerican World, Washington D.C., Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, pp. 84–127.

17. Hodge M.G. (1984) Aztec City-States, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 166 p.

18. Johansson Keraudren P. (2004) La palabra, la imagen y el manuscrito. Lecturas indígenas de un texto pictórico en el siglo XVI [The Word, the image and the manuscript. Indigenous readinings of one pictorial text in the XVI century], México, UNAM, 480 p. (In Spanish) Kristan-Graham C., Kowalsky J.K. (2011) Chichen Itza, Tula and Tollan. Changing Perspectives on a Recurring Problem, in J.K. Kowalsky, C. Kristan-Graham (eds.) Twin Tollans. Chichén Itzá, Tula, and the Epiclassic to Early Postclassic Mesoamerican World, Washington D.C., Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, pp. 1–58.

19. Leibsohn D. (2009) Script and Glyph. Prehispanic History, Colonial Boolmaking and the Historia Tolteca-Chichimeca, Washington D.C., Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 200 p.

20. López Lujan L., Anda Rogel M.de. (2017) Teotihuacan en Mexico-Tenochtitlan: descubrimientos recientes nuevas perspectivas [Teotihuacan in Mexico-Tenochtitlan: recent discoveries, new perspectives], Estudios de cultura náhuatl, no. 54, pp. 17–60. (In Spanish)

21. Morgan L.H. (1877) Ancient Society or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization, London, MacMillan & Company, 560 p.

22. Muñoz Camargo D. (1966) Historia de Tlaxcala [History of Tlaxcala], Guadalajara, Universidad de Guadalajara, 278 p. (In Spanish)

23. Sahagún B. de (1979–1981) Códice Florentino. El manuscrito 218-20 de la colección palatina de la Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana [Florentine Codex. The Manuscript 218-20 of the Laurenzo Medichi Library], México, Fondo de Cultura Ecónomica, 3 vols. (In Spanish and Nahuatl)

24. Sanders W.T., Webster D. (1988) The Mesoamerican Urban Tradition, American Anthropologist, no. 90, pp. 521–546.

25. Vázquez Chamorro G. (ed.) (2001) Origen de los mexicanos [Origin of Mexicans], Madrid, Dastin, 223 p. (In Spanish)