Iberoamerican Culture: The Experience of a Spatial and Geographical Analysis
https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-2-59-82
Abstract
Space and time are the most organic coordinates of culture; therefore a culture of any country or region can be studied both in time, i.e. historically, and in space, i.e. geographically. The analysis of national geocultural systems has become the object of research by scientists who study cultural geography. The evolution of this branch of geography in Russia has not been easy, which makes its new wave even more remarkable: the range of research is becoming ever wider and includes the ethnic diversity of countries and peoples, sacred geography, linguistic and regional studies, the geography of art and literature. Taking into account the achievements of foreign cultural geographers and using the example of national reality, Russian researchers have already created their own methodology, which is applicable to the cases of foreign countries. The Ibero-American countries have a plethora of components to study precisely through the lens of culture and geography. Naturally, many historical and archaeological monuments, architectural objects, natural and cultural landscapes both in the Iberian Peninsula and in Latin America are included in the UNESCO World Heritage List. The idiosyncrasy of the Hispanic and Latin American culture, its characteristics, the features that the Iberian area and Latin America have in common and those that set them apart from each other literally call for research through the prism of geography. The present article aims to showcase the diversity inherent to the cultural and geographical landscapes of Ibero-America. In addition to mentioning sacred places, architectural objects, and other elements of cultural infrastructure, there is a special emphasis on the reflection of geographical space in art and the perception of the image of a landscape in literature. The synthesis of such components helps to get a generalized understanding of cultural and geographical regional studies.
About the Author
E. G. ErmólievaRussian Federation
Eleonora G. Ermolieva, PhD (Economics), leading researcher at the Centre of Iberian Studies
115035, Russia, Moscow, Bolshaya Ordynka street, 21/16
References
1. Abramova A.D., Guerrero Bojorquez O.F. (2024) Transtsendentsiya amerikanskikh uzorov [Transcendence of American Patterns], in O.A. Lavrenova (ed.) [The Geography of Art: Mean-ings of Art], Moscow, INION RAN, pp. 423–438 (In Russian)
2. Astakhova E.V., Davtyan Yu.V., Kriukova E.V. (2024) [Spanish-speaking countries of Latin and the Caribbean: national images. History. Culture. Language. Textbook on linguistic and regional studies], Moscow, Prometey, 460 p. (In Russian)
3. Vail P. (2010) [The Genius of the Place], Moscow, Corpus, 448 p. (In Russian)
4. Vedenin Y.A. (1990) Problemy formirovaniya kul’turnogo landshafta i ego izucheniе [Problems of cultural landscape formation and its study], no. 1, pp. 5–17. (In Russian)
5. Vedenin Y.A. (2019) Kul’turnyi landshaft kak khranitel’ pamyati Oikumeny [Cultural landscape as a guardian of the Ecumenic memory], no. 1 (36), pp. 21–37 (In Russian)
6. Vedenin Y.A., Kalutskov V.N. (2022) [Literary Geography of Rusia: Atlas-Guide Book], Moscow, Iz-datel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 295 p. (In Russian)
7. Gavrilenko S.M. (2021) Obrazy Zemli: kontseptsiya geografi heskogo voobrazheniya v kul’turnoi geografi Denisa Kosgrouva [Images of Earth: Conception of Geographical Imagination in Denis Cosgrove’s Cultural Geography], no. 4 (30), pp. 36–57. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-4-36-57 (In Russian)
8. Dmitrevskaya, N.F., Dmitrevsky, Y.D. (1990) Geografiya kul’tury i novoe politicheskoe myshlenie [Geography of Culture and New Political Th king], [Geography, Politics and Culture], Leningrad, Nauka, pp. 127–134. (In Russian)
9. Druzhinin A.G. (1995) [Theoretical and methodological foundations of geographical studies of culture], Doctoral thesis abstract, Saint Petersburg, 51 p. (In Russian)
10. Druzhinin A.G., Streletsky V.N. (2015) «Kul’turnaya sostavlyayushchaya» obshchestvennoi geografi v sovremennoi Rossii: genezis, osobennosti i prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya [«Cultural Branch» of Human Geography in Contemporary Russia: Genesis, Main Peculiarities, and Priorities of Development], no. 1, pp. 5–20. (In Russian)
11. Kalutskov V.N. (2008) [Landscape in cultural geography], Moscow, Novyi khronograf, 320 p. (In Russian)
12. Lavrenova O.A. (2013) Landshaft kak istochnik metaforicheskoi proektsii [Landscape as a Source of Metaphorical Projection], vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 126–132. (In Russian)
13. Lavrenova O.A. (ed.) (2024) [The Geography of Art: Meanings of Art], Moscow, INION RAN, 472 p. (In Russian)
14. Lukina A.V. (2004) Novye podkhody k issledovaniyu natsional’noi identichnosti [New approaches to the study of national identity], no. 33, pp. 238–246. (In Russian)
15. Morozova M.M. (2019) Osobennosti sovremennoi zarubezhnoi literaturnoi geografi [The Features of Modern Foreign Literary Geography], [Public geography in a changing world: fundamental and applied research: proceedings of the International scientifi conference within the framework of the X Scientifi Assembly of the Association of Russian Social Geographers (ARGO), Kazan, September 17–22, 2019], Kazan, Kazanskii (Privolzhskii) federal’nyi universitet, pp. 558–560. (In Russian)
16. Okunev I.Yu., Ostapenko G.I. (2021) [Capital Cities Semiotics], Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet, 291 p. (In Russian)
17. Pavlova, E.G. (1974) Kul’turno-geografi heskaya kharakteristika strany [Cultural and geographical characteristics of the country], in V.A. Kuz’mishchev (ed.) [Culture of Colombia], Moscow, Nauka, pp. 77–86. (In Russian)
18. Pavlova E.G. (1975) Territorial’nyi aspekt razvitiya natsional’noi kul’tury Peru [Territorial aspect of the development of the national culture of Peru], in V.A. Kuz’mishchev (ed.) [Culture of Peru], Moscow, Nauka, pp. 110–124. (In Russian)
19. Ragulina M.V. (2013) Klassicheskaya kontseptsiya kul’turnogo landshafta Karla Zauera: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Morphology of landscape by Carl Sauer: past and present of this classic geographical theory], vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 174–182. (In Russian)
20. Ratzel F. (1903) [Ethnology. Essay in 2 volumes], Saint Petersburg, Prosveshchenie, vol. 1–2, 768 p., 880 p. (In Russian)
21. Streletsky V.N. (2003) Kul’turno-landshaftnye issledovaniya v Germanii: traditsii i sovremennost’ [Cultural-Landscape studies in Germany: tradition and modernity] in V.N. Kalutskov, T.M. Krasovskaya (eds.) [Cultural landscape: theoretical and regional studies], Moscow, Izd-vo MGU, pp. 42–54. (In Russian)
22. Streletsky V.N., Gorohov S.A. (2022) Spetsifika i tendentsii razvitiya kul’turnoi geografi v Rossii v nachale XXI veka [Cultural Geography in Russia at the Beginning of the 21st Century: National Specifi and Development Trends], vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 374–392. (In Russian)
23. Suhova N.G. (2009) Aleksandr Gumbol’dt i Karl Ritter [Alexander von Humboldt and Karl Ritter], vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 73–81. (In Russian)
24. Hudyaev A.S (2015) «Sakral’noe prostranstvo» i «sakral’naya geografiya» kak semioticheskie koncepty [«Sacred space» and «sacred geography» as semiotic concepts], no. 3 (17), рр. 90–101. (In Russian)
25. Sheleshneva-Solodovnikova N.A. (2008a) [Latin American Art of the 16th–20th Centuries. Historical Essay], Moscow, URSS, 392 p. (In Russian)
26. Sheleshneva-Solodovnikova N.A. (2008b) Antonio Gaudi. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo [Antonio Gaudi. Life and Work of Genius], in V.Yu. Silyunas, I.A. Kryazheva (eds.) [Problems of Iberoamerican Art], Moscow, Gosudarstvennyi institut iskusstvoznaniya, pp. 180–206. (In Russian)
27. Sheleshneva-Solodovnikova N.A. (2014) Zhivopis’ Peru XX — nachala XXI vekov: ot indihenizma do neoindihenizma [Painting of Peru in the 20th – early 21st centuries: from Indigenism to Neo-Indigenism], , no. 10, pp. 83–100. (In Russain)
28. Sheleshneva-Solodovnikova N.A. (2022) Ispaniya i Latinskaya Amerika: arhitektura kak identichnost’ regiona, izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo kak narrativ i performans nacii [ Spain and Latin America: Architecture as Regional Identity, Fine Arts as Narrative and Performance of the Nation] in N.S. Konstantinova (ed.) [Iberoamerica: the role of culture formation and evolution of national identity], Moscow, ILA RAN, 244 p. (In Russian)
29. Cosgrove D. (1989) Geography is Everywhere: Culture and Symbolism in Human Landscapes, in Gregory D., Walford R. (eds.) London, Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19839-9_7
30. Denevan W.M., Mathewson K. (eds.) (2009) Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 458 p.
31. Lavrenova O. (2019) Cham, Springer, 216 р.
32. Lavrenova O. (2021) El paisaje cultural como un refl o de la teoría cognitiva de la metáfora [Сultural landscape as a refl ction of the Сognitive Theory of the metaphor], no. 35, pp. 101–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35659/designis.i35p101-111 (In Spanish)
33. Sauer C.O. (1996) The Morphology of Landscape, in J.A. Agnew, D.J. Livingstone, A. Rogers (eds.) Oxford, Blackwell publishing, pp. 296–315.
Review
For citations:
Ermólieva E.G. Iberoamerican Culture: The Experience of a Spatial and Geographical Analysis. Cuadernos Iberoamericanos. 2025;13(2):59-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-2-59-82