Disposition of Latin American Society Toward Intraregional Integration: The Civilizational-Cultural Aspect

Latin American civilization is characterized as «borderline» for which constant cultural synthesis, internal diversity, and a continuous process of self-identification are typical. The article is devoted to analyzing the disposition of Latin American society towards intra-regional integration through the lens of civilizational-cultural identity. Can a common identity serve as a solid foundation for integration processes in the region? Answering this question requires considering the historical, social, and cultural factors influencing the attitude of Latin American society towards regional integration.

The following research methods were used in the work: the historical method while analyzing the deep-seated causes and origins of integration processes in the region; comparative analysis when applying various civilizational-cultural paradigms to the Latin American region; analysis of public opinion when studying the attitude of modern Latin American society towards integration. The work employs authoritative theoretical civilizational-cultural models by S. Huntington, Inglehart-Welzel, and Sh. Schwartz, the analysis of which demonstrates significant value heterogeneity among Latin American countries. Based on these models, several groups of states with fundamentally different cultural priorities are identified, which creates serious obstacles to the formation of a unified integration model.

The results of the study reveal a significant dissonance between formally high public support for integration (about 81 %) and its actual driving forces. Data from sociological surveys indicate that this support is predominantly pragmatic in nature and associated with expectations of specific economic benefits, rather than with a sense of civilizational-cultural commonality. The analysis shows that the foundation of the integration process in Latin America is anti-imperialist orientation and common geopolitical interests, however, value unity remains rather conditional. As a result, the success of regional cooperation depends more on conjunctural political and economic factors than on a deep-seated common identity.

1. Davydov V.M. (2025) Latinoamerikanskiy paradoks — rastushchee mnogoobrazie na pochve unikal’noy obshchnosti [Latin American Paradox: Growing Diversity Based on Unique Unity], Iberoamerican Papers, no. 1, pp. 12–29. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-1-12-29 (In Russian)

2. Davydov V.M., Kodzoev M.A. (2025) Latinskaya Amerika v usloviyakh menyayushchegosya miroporyadka [Latin America in the Context of a Changing World Order], World Eсonomy and International Relations, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 39–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2025-69-1-39-52 (In Russian)

3. Emel’yanov A.I. (2014) Formirovanie tsivilizatsionnoĭ identichnosti na primere gosudarstv Latinskoĭ Ameriki. [The Formation of Civilizational Identity: The Case of Latin American States], Vestnik MGLU. Obshchestvennye nauki, no. 23, pp. 53–61 (In Russian) DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.10.17109

4. Larionova M.V. (2025) Svoi sredi chuzhikh, chuzhoi sredi svoikh: o latinoamerikanskoi identichnosti skvoz’ prizmu etnonimov latinoamericano/latin, hispanic [One of Our Own Among Strangers, a Stranger Among Our Own: On Latin American Identity Through the Prism of the Ethnonyms latinoamericano/latin, hispanic], Iberoamerican Papers, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 39–63 (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-3-39-63

5. Morozov V.I. (2015) Posol’skie lektsii. Latinskaya Amerika — stanovlenie samostoyatel’nogo tsentra vliyaniya v mire [Embassy lectures. Latin America is becoming an independent center of influence in the world], Rossiiskii sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam (RSMD), 04.12.2015. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/posolskie-lektsii-latinskaya-amerika-stanovlenie-samostoyate/?sphrase_id=33826848 (accessed: 07.12.2025)

6. Sossyur F. (2025) Kurs obshchei lingvistiki [Course in General Linguistics], Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Yurait, 303 p. (In Russian)

7. Chumakov A.N., Grinin L.E., Malkov S.Yu. et al. (2024) Tsivilizatsiya kak ob”ekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya (materialy kruglogo stola) [Civilization as an object of interdisciplinary research (materials of the round table)], Vek globalizatsii, no. 3, pp. 40–57. DOI: 10.30884/vglob/2024.03.04. (In Russian)

8. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2001) Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: Vzaimodeistvie tsivilizatsii v kontekste vsemirnoi istorii [Europe and Latin America: Civilizational Interaction in the Context of World History], Moscow, Nauka, 394 p. (In Russian)

9. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2014) Subekumeny i “pogranichnye” tsivilizatsii v sravnitel’no-istoricheskoi perspektive: o kharaktere sootnosheniya Yazyka, Teksta i Shrifta. Statya 1 [Sub-ecumenes and ‘Borderline’ Civilizations in Comparative-Historical Perspective: On the Interrelation of Language, Text, and Script. Article 1], Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 2, pp. 113– 123 (In Russian)

10. Shemyakin. Ya.G. (2022) K voprosu o kul’turnoi determinatsii razlichnykh sfer zhizni sotsiuma. Dukhovno-tsennostnoe izmerenie. [On the Cultural Determinants of Various Spheres of Societal Life: The Spiritual-Value Dimension], Latinskaya Amerika, no. 11, pp. 6–25 (In Russian)

11. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2023) «Velikie geograficheskie otkrytija»: smysl i istoricheskoe soderzhanie termina v svete opyta vzaimodejstvija civilizacij v Novom Svete [“Great geographical discoveries”: the meaning and historical content of the term in the light of the experience of interaction of civilizations in the New World], Iberoamerican Papers, no. 1, pp. 41–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2023-11-1-41-67 (In Russian)

12. Bilbao F., Bilbao M (2009) Obras completas de Francisco Bilbao: tomo I. [Complete Works of Francisco Bilbao: Volume I] Harvard University, 683 P. (In Spanish)

13. Calderon-Valencia F. (2020) Método Comparatista Arosemeniano: La Historia Constitucional Comparada en el pensamiento de don Justo Arosemena. [The Arosemenian Comparative Method: Comparative Constitutional History in the Thought of Don Justo Arosemena], Revista Brasileira de Direito, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1–19 (In Spanish)

14. Garnero P., Trombetta M., Florencia Merino M. (2024) América Latina en conexión: apoyo récord a la integración regional [Latin America Connected: Record Support for Regional Integration], Buenos Aires, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Instituto para la Integración de América Latina y el Caribe, INTAL, 66 p. (In Spanish)

15. Gobat M. (2013) The Invention of Latin America: A Transnational History of Anti-Imperialism, Democracy, and Race, American Historical Review, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 1345–1375.

16. Granados A., Marichal C. (eds.) (2009) Construcción de Las Identidades Latinoamericanas: Ensayos de Historia Intelectual, Siglos XIX y XX [The Construction of Latin American Identities: Essays in Intellectual History, 19th-20th Centuries], México, El Colegio de Mexico, Centro de Estudios Históricos, 269 р. (In Spanish)

17. Herrera L.C. (2017) Proceso de integración de América Latina y el Caribe [The Integration Process of Latin America and the Caribbean], Revista de Ciencias Sociales, no. 158, pp. 167–183 (In Spanish)

18. Huntington S.P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York, Simon & Schuster, 368 p.

19. Lamy P., Armony V., Tremblay A. (2004) Values, culture and the economic integration of Latin America and North America: an empirical perspective on culturalist approaches, Diálogos Latinoamericanos, no. 9, pp. 87–102.

20. Mignolo W.D. (2005) The Idea of Latin America, Malden, Blackwell Publishing, 198 p.

21. Mora L.M. (2023) La permanente búsqueda de la integración en América Latina y el Caribe [The Ongoing Quest for Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean] Revista CEPAL, no. 141, рр. 113–130 (In Spanish)

22. Phelan J.L. (2018) Pan-latinism, French intervention in México (1861–1867) and the genesis of the idea of Latin America, in J.A. Ortega y Medina (ed.) Conciencia y autenticidad históricas. Escritos en homenaje a Edmundo O’Gorman, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, pp. 279–298.

23. Saladino García А. (2010) El latinoamericanismo como pensamiento descolonizador. [Latin Americanism as Decolonial Thought], Revista Universum, no. 25, pp. 179–186 (In Spanish)

24. Schwartz S.H. (2014) National Culture as Value Orientations: Consequences of Value Differences and Cultural Distance, in V.A. Ginsburgh, D. Throsby (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Volume 2, Oxford, Elsevier, рр. 547–586.