Informal Settlements in South American Cities: The Social Dimension
https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-1-103-124
Abstract
This study focuses on slums, their structure and internal organization. The informal settlements in the South American countries of Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil have been chosen as the object of the study. The author aims to explore the phenomenon of slums, which are an integral part of most major cities in South America, from the point of view of the nature and historical circumstances of their emergence, the social aspects of their inhabitants’ life and their impact on the surrounding urban spaces. The evidence is derived from field research in Montevideo (Lezica and Villa Colón districts and the slum settlement of Santa Eugenia), an interview with a representative of the education sector who works with children and parents from disadvantaged neighborhoods, as well as government reports on the problems of slums and ongoing programs to support vulnerable populations in the countries studied. The research has led to the discovery of specific patterns of slum formation and of the impact of slum settlements on surrounding spaces, and has helped to document the profile of slum dwellers. The author concludes that the negative connotations associated with the concept of slums do not fully reflect this phenomenon, which has positive manifestations, including strong social ties and the potential for mutual assistance within the communities of local residents.
About the Author
O. L. KraevRussian Federation
Oleg L. Kraev, PhD (Philosophy), independent researcher, author of the «La Plata» Telegram channel (https://t.me/viento_lp),
610005, Kirov, Profsoyuznaya street, 78-28.
References
1. Gorshenyov D.S. (2017) Religiya v kul’ture sovremennoi Brazilii: tsennostnye osnovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava [Religion in Contemporary Brazilian Culture: Axiological Grounds of Constitutional Legislation], Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedenie, Vol. 21, pp. 180–186. (In Russian)
2. Dekhtyar G.M., Nikolskaya E.Yu., Filatova M.S., Khristov T.T. (2021) Trushchobnyi turizm kak format al’ternativnogo vida puteshestvii: metodologicheskie voprosy i uspeshnye praktiki [Slum tourism as an alternative form of travel: methodological issues and successful practices], Services in Russia and Abroad, no. 15(2), pp. 17–29. DOI: 10.24412/1995-042X-2021-2-17-29 (In Russian)
3. Zlobin V. (2012) Planirovochnye printsipy formirovaniya trushchob v Moskve na primere Cherkizovskogo rynka [Planning principles for the formation of slums in Moscow as an example of Cherkizovsky market], Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, no. 2, 15 р. (In Russian)
4. Stas I.N. (2017) Urbanizatsiya samostroya: trushchoby v neftedobyvayushchikh raionakh sovetskoi Sibiri (1960–1980-e gg.) [Urbanization through samostroy: slums in oil-producing regions of Soviet Siberia in the 1960s to the 1980s], Siberian Historical Research, no. 2, pp. 80–99. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/16/6 (In Russian)
5. Altmann Macchio L.D., González Orge A. (2024) Cuatro configuraciones de la política nacional sobre asentamientos irregulares en Uruguay (1995–2024) [Four configurations of the national policy on irregular settlements in Uruguay (1995–2024)], Cuadernos Del CLAEH, no. 43(120), pp. 127–145. DOI: 10.29192/claeh.43.2.8 (In Spanish)
6. Antuñano E. de (2021) A Global History of Slums, Shantytowns, and Improvised Cities, Journal of Urban History, no. 47(4), pp. 928–936. DOI: 10.1177/0096144220927685
7. Codebò A. (2020) Against the Grid: The Cultural Emergence of Villas Miseria in Buenos Aires, Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, no. 29(1), pp. 85–107. DOI: 10.1080/13569325.2019.1636365
8. Figueiredo G.O. (2017) Un análisis histórico-crítico del fenómeno de las favelas en Rio de Janeiro/Brasil [A historical-critical analysis of the favelas phenomenon in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil], Jangwa Pana, no. 16(2), pp. 235–249. DOI: 10.21676/16574923.2131 (In Spanish)
9. Filardo V., Merklen D. (2023) Detrás de la línea de la pobreza: la vida en los barrios populares de Montevideo [Behind the poverty line: life in Montevideo’s popular neighbourhoods], Montevideo, Ediciones del Berretín, 430 p. (In Spanish)
10. Franco J., Raffo A. (2014) La utopía realizable de la ‘propiedad colectiva’ [The realizable utopia of ‘collective ownership’], in G. González (coord.) La vivienda, entre el derecho y la mercancía. Las formas de propiedad en América Latina [Housing, between rights and merchandise.
11. The forms of property in Latin America], Montevideo, Trilce, pp. 63–76. (In Spanish)
12. Gómez Gómez J.S., López Zapata L.V., Lellis Mees L.A. (2019) ¿Por qué vienen los turistas? Estudio comparado entre las favelas y barrios populares de Medellín [Why do tourists come? comparative research between favelas and popular settlements in Medellín], Criterio Libre, no. 17(31), pp. 365–382. DOI: 10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2019v18n31.6146 (In Spanish)
13. Gonza C.N., Hessling Herrera F., González F.D. (2023) “Mi Pieza”: la dimensión energética en una política habitacional para mujeres de barrios populares argentinos [“Mi Pieza”: The Energy Dimensionin a Housing Policy for Women in Poor Neighborhoods in Argentina], Cuadernos de Vivienda y Urbanismo, no. 16, 15 р. DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.cvu16.mpde (In Spanish)
14. Kaztman R., Avila S., Baraibar X., Corbo G., Filgueira F., Errandonea F., Furtado M., Gelber D., Retamaso A., Rodríguez F. (2004) La ciudad fragmentada: Respuesta de los sectores populares urbanos a las transformaciones del mercado y del territorio en Montevideo [The fragmented city: Response of urban popular sectors to market and territorial transformations in Montevideo] in Serie Documentos de Trabajo del IPES / Colección Monitor Social del Uruguay № 2 [IPES Working Paper Series / Uruguay Social Monitor Collection № 2], Montevideo, Universidad Católica, 54 р. URL: ttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/aucdocumento.aspx?1020,3221 (In Spanish)
15. Moayerian N., Poets D., Stephenson M.Jr., Grimes C. (2023) The Arts and Individual and Collective Agency: A Brazilian Favela Case Study, Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, no. 10(4), pp. 58–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1407
16. Mohanty M. (2020) Squatter Settlements and Slums and Sustainable Development, in W. Leal Filho, A.M. Azul, L. Brandli, P.G. Özuyar, T. Wall (eds.) Sustainable Cities and Communities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Cham, Springer, pp. 1–12, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_49-1.
17. Papadia A. (2019) Slaves, Migrants and Development in Brazil, 1872–1923. EUI Working Paper MWP, Fiesole, European University Institute, 49 р. URL: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/63508/MWP_WP_Papadia_2019_05.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed: 10.01.2025)
18. Pereira R.M., Carvalho Castro C.L. de, Cheibub B.L. (2019) Favela ou comunidade? Como os moradores, guias de turismo e outros agentes sociais compreendem simbolicamente o “morro” Santa Marta (RJ)? [Slums (“Favela”) or community? How do inhabitants, tourism guides and other social agents symbolically comprehend the Santa Marta’s hill (RJ)?], Revista Brasileira de Estudos Do Lazer, no. 6(3), pp. 23–36. (In Portuguese)
19. Rossi T. (2022) Construcción del imaginario y cultura migratoria entre los bolivianos en Argentina [The Construction of the Imaginary and Migratory Culture Among Bolivians in Argentina], Cultura Latinoamericana, no. 35 (1), pp. 114–144. (In Spanish)
20. Snitcofsky V. (2018) La erradicación de villas en la ciudad de Buenos Aires: características específicas y contexto general (1976–1983) [The eradication of shanty towns in the city of Buenos Aires: specific features and general context (1976–1983)], Clepsidra. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Sobre Memoria, no. 5(10), pp. 54–75. (In Spanish)
Review
For citations:
Kraev O.L. Informal Settlements in South American Cities: The Social Dimension. Cuadernos Iberoamericanos. 2025;13(1):103-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2025-13-1-103-124