The Name as Immortality: Ibero-Romance Anthroponymy in the Focus of Contemporary Onomastic Studies

The diversity and heterogeneity of onomastic concepts is a driving force behind research into anthroponymy, one of the most important areas of scientific knowledge. The art of studying and describing linguistic and extralinguistic characteristics by systematizing proper names, deserves the attention of linguists, ethnologists, culturologists, cognitive scientists, sociologists and other specialists. The anthroponym is a phenomenal component of the onym, a symbolic and unique construction, which is inextricably linked to a person’s outlook and ethnocultural world view. The proper name, whose functions include identification and differentiation, is a tool for self-understanding and recognizing one’s individuality. Anthroponymy, in turn, has an anthropological, historical, sociological and linguistic dimension and plays an important role in people’s understanding of their past and present. Until early eighties of the 20th century, onomastics was terra incognita for Ibero-Romance researchers, although the concept of anthroponymy was introduced in 1911 by the Portuguese ethnographer J. Leite de Vasconcelos Pereira de Melo, who pointed out that it was essential to study the multifaceted semantic content of Ibero-Romance personal names, patronymics and surnames. The semantics of the anthroponymic model involves cultural and historical characteristics typical of the current period, pinpoints telltale signs that the name bearer belongs to a certain social class, and contains information about local traditions or ideology. With that in mind, Russian and foreign researchers of the 21st century maintain that anthroponymy expands the boundaries of linguistics and has the potential to unite many humanities, as it provides a starting point to analyze particular aspects of various disciplines.

1. Bakhtin M.M. (1990) Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekov’ya i Renessansa [The work of Francois Rabelais and the folk culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance], Moscow, Hudozhestvennaya literatura, 544 р. (In Russian)

2. Bakhtin M.M. (1992) Dopolneniya i izmeneniya k Rable [Additions and changes to Rabelais], Voprosy filologii, no. 1, рр. 134–164. (In Russian)

3. Bondaletov V.D. (1983) Russkaya onomastika [Russian Onomastics], Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 224 p. (In Russian)

4. Vasilyeva O.A. (2015) Onomasticheskaya leksika kak predmet izucheniya issledovatelei-lingvistov [Onomastic Lexicon as a Subject of Study by Researchers Linguists], Baltic Humanitarian Journal, no. 1 (10), pp. 19–22. (In Russian)

5. Voyakina E.Yu., Mordovina T.V., Zaitseva V.V. (2019) Metaforicheskoe napolnenie onima s konnotativnym znacheniem [The metaphorical content of onym with a connotative meaning], The world of science, culture and education, no. 1 (74), pp. 369–371. (In Russian)

6. Zenenko N.V., Son L.P. (2022) Semanticheskaya zona antroponimov i gruppa pronominal’nykh sushchestvitel’nykh: biparadigmal’nyi podkhod (na materiale ibero-romanskikh yazykov) [The semantic zone of anthroponyms and a group of pronominal nouns: a paradigmatic approach (based on the material of the Ibero-Romance languages)], Kazan Science, no. 10, pp. 146–150. (In Russian)

7. Kartavaya Yu.K. (2016) Retrospektiva issledovaniya onomastiki russkogo yazyka [Retrospection of Russian Onomastics Studies], Philology. Theory & Practice, no. 7-1 (61), pp. 94–96. (In Russian)

8. Klimkova L.A., Medvedkova E.S. (2016) «Onomastika Povolzh’ya» kak nauchnoe napravlenie i kak meropriyatie [«Onomastics of the Volga Region» as Scientific Direction and as Action], Vestnik of Volzhsky University after V.N. Tatischev, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 89–93. (In Russian)

9. Medzhidova H.M. (2017) Neofitsial’naya onomasticheskaya sistema kak ob”ekt nauchnogo issledovaniya [Informal onomastic system as a scientific research object], The world of science, culture and education, no. 6 (67), pp. 531–533. (In Russian)

10. Nikonov V.A. (1974) Imya i obshchestvo [Name and society], Moscow, Nauka, 278 p. (In Russian)

11. Podolskaya N.V. (1978) Slovar’ russkoj onomasticheskoj terminologii [Dictionary of Russian Onomastic terminology], Moscow, Nauka, 200 p. (In Russian)

12. Rylov Yu.A. (2006) Imena sobstvennye v evropejskih yazykah. Romanskaya i russkaya antroponimika. Kurs lekcij po mezhkul’turnoj kommunikacii [Proper names in European languages. Roman and Russian anthroponymy. A course of lectures on intercultural communication], Moscow, AST: Vostok — Zapad, 311 p. (In Russian)

13. Superanskaya A.V. (1973) Obshchaya teoriya imeni sobstvennogo [General theory of the proper name], Moscow, Nauka, 366 p. (In Russian)

14. Shalatskaya K.V. (2016) Osnovnaya terminologiya issledovaniya imen sobstvennykh [Вasic terminology of the study of proper names], Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, no. 4(13), pp. 100–102. (In Russian)

15. Aguilar V. (1997) Mujeres y repertorios biográficos [Women and biographical catalogues], in M.L. Ávila, M. Marín (eds.) Biografías y género biográfico en el occidente islámico [Biographies and biographical genre in the Islamic West], Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, pp. 127–139. (In Spanish)

16. Albaigès i Olivart J.M. (1995) Enciclopedia de los nombres propios. El origen y significado de todos los nombres. Sus diminutivos, sus derivados, sus anécdotas [Encyclopedia of proper names. The origin and meaning of all names. Its diminutives, its derivatives, its anecdotes], Barcelona, Planeta, 490 p. (In Spanish)

17. Bajo Pérez E. (2019) El nombre propio en las adivinanzas: usos anfibológicos, progenéricos y metalingüísticos [The proper name in riddles: amphibological, progeneric and metalinguistic use], in J. Braga Riera, C. Cid Abasolo Onomástica, Deonomástica y Documentación [Onomastics, Deonomastics and Documentation], Kassel, Reichenberger, pp. 115–142. (In Spanish)

18. Ballester Gómez X. (2008) Las inscripciones arqueoibéricas sobre cerámica de La Rioja: una revisión de detalle [The archaeoiberic inscriptions on ceramics from La Rioja: a detailed review], Kalakorikos, no. 13, pp. 195–212. (In Spanish)

19. Fernández Juncal C. (2019) Evolución de los usos antroponímicos en España [Evolution of anthroponymic uses in Spain], Moenia, vol. 25, pp. 149–177. (In Spanish)

20. Fernández Pérez E.A. (2015) El nombre y los apellidos. Su regulación en derecho español y comparado [The name and the surnames. Its regulation in Spanish and comparative law], Tesis doctoral, Sevilla, 750 p. (In Spanish)

21. Ferrer i Jané J. (2012) Śaleitaŕtin: testimoni múltiple d’un antropònim ibèric al jaciment de Can Rossó (Argençola) [Śaleitaŕtin: multiple testimonies of one Iberian anthroponym at the site of Can Rosso (Argençola)], Revista d’Arqueologia de Ponent, no. 22, pp. 143–152. (In Catalan)

22. García Gallarín C. (1998) Los nombres de pila españoles [The Spanish given names], Madrid, Ediciones del Prado, 366 p. (In Spanish)

23. Jacinto Santos P.E. (2013) Onomástica: Estudio sobre Apellidos y Nombres Propios de Personas en la Comunidad Ashéninka del Gran Pajonal [Onomastics: Study on Surnames and Proper Names of People in the Ashéninka Community of the Gran Pajonal], Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 117 p. (In Spanish)

24. Leite de Vasconcelos J. (1911) Lições de Filologia Portuguesa dadas na Biblioteca Nacional de Lisboa [Portuguese Philology lessons], Lisboa, A.M. Teixeira & С., 520 р. (In Portuguese)

25. López Álvarez A.M. (2011) Los topónimos Soria y Soriano en la onomástica sefardí [The place names Soria and Soriano in the Sephardic onomastics], in E. Romero Castelló, A. García Moreno Estudios sefardíes dedicados a la memoria de Iacob M. Hassán (z”I) [Sephardi studies dedicated to the memory of Jacob M. Hassan (z”I)], Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC. Fundación San Millán de la Cogolla. Asociación de Amigos del Museo Sefardí, pp. 319–330. (In Spanish)

26. López Franco Y.G. (2023) De camino a la laicidad: los nombres atribuidos en 1970, en la parroquia de San Bartolomé Apóstol, Naucalpan de Juárez, Estado de México [On the way to secularism: the names attributed in 1970, in the parish of San Bartolomé Apóstol, Naucalpan de Juárez, State of Mexico], Onomástica desde América Latina, v. 4, pp. 1–26. DOI: 10.48075/odal.v4i1.30757 (In Spanish)

27. Mir de la Cruz R. (1981) Estadística y antroponimia [Statistics and anthroponymy], Estadística española, no. 91, pp. 63–73. (In Spanish)

28. Moncunill Martí N. (2016) Novecientos antropónimos ibéricos [Nine hundred Iberian anthroponyms], Palaeohispanica, no. 16, pp. 81–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36707/palaeohispanica.v0i16.26 (In Spanish)

29. Peral Rabasa F.J. (2020) La antroponimia en tiempos de la protección de los datos personales [Anthroponymy in times of personal data protection], Onomástica Desde América Latina, n. 1, v. 1, janeiro–junho, pp. 45–76. DOI: 10.48075/odal.v1i1.24160. (In Spanish)

30. Reyes Díaz M.J., Marrero Pulido V. (2013) Antropónimos. Análisis de una muestra canaria de los dos últimos decenios [Anthroponyms. Analysis of a Canarian sample of the last two decades], Nouvelle revue d’onomastique, no. 55, pp. 191–231. (In Spanish)

31. Rodríguez Ramos J. (2014) Nuevo Índice Crítico de formantes de compuestos de tipo onomástico íberos [New Critic Index of composed formants of iberian onomastic type], ArqueoWeb, no. 15, pp. 81–238. (In Spanish)

32. Souza Pereira M.A. de (2021) Léxico e onionímia: um estudo de nomes próprios de cachaças da cidade de Salinas-MG [Lexicon and ononymy: a study of proper names of cachaças in the city of Salinas-MG], Onomástica Desde América Latina, no. 4, v. 2, pp. 130–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v0i0.27524. (In Portuguese)

33. Velaza J. (2015) Salaeco: un teónimo ibérico [Salaeco: an Iberian theonym], Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, no. 194, pp. 290–291. (In Spanish)