Different Forms of Feminist Urbanism in Latin America

Feminist urbanism belongs to the philosophical tradition of the anthropocentric city and is implemented through various practices, such as activism and public education, artistic and socio-political actionism, theoretical research, statistical data collection, planning and implementation of projects in architecture, design and urban planning, as well as in the media. In recent years, the problems of women in Latin American cities have attracted scholars’ attention and have been postulated as a set of problems stemming from living and working conditions and gender roles distribution. Urbanism is not neutral since the city design has historically been based on androcentric criteria, thus restricting women’s, children’s, disabled and elderly people’s ability to make the most of urban spaces. The urban space should be considered as a mechanism for the equal distribution of benefits between different groups of the population and the improvement of the physical, spatial and psychological conditions of their residence. Feminist urbanism appeared as a critical view, determined to solve certain problems through different practices in urban space, when the transformation in the city is produced by the community, i.e. the people who are aware of their demands and needs. In view of the growing role of women in society, it is of interest to examine and analyze different forms of women’s movement in Latin America in the field of urban planning and to conduct case studies to identify examples of practical implementation of feminist urbanism principles in particular urban improvement projects in Latin American countries. The realization of the «right to the city» by urban communities through various forms of participation leads to an emerging sense of involvement, security and life satisfaction.

1. Kofman A.F. (2020) Machizm i ego otrazhenie v ispanoamerikanskom fol’klore [Machismo and its reflection in Spanish American folklore], Tradicionnaya kul’tura, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 76–90. (In Russian)

2. Manheim K. (1929). Ideologija i utopija [Ideology and utopia], Digital Library RoyalLib. com. URL: https://royallib.com/book/mangeym_karl/ideologiya_i_utopiya.html (accessed: 15.02.2024). (In Russian)

3. Delgado M. (1999) El animal público. Hacia una antropología de los espacios urbanos [The Public Animal: Towards an Anthropology of Urban Spaces], Barcelona, Anagrama, 221 p. (In Spanish)

4. Falú A., Morey P., Rainiero L. (2002) Uso del tiempo y del espacio: asimetrías de género y de clase [The Use of Time and Space: Gender and Class Asymmetries], in A. Falú, L. Rainiero, P.Morey (eds.), Ciudad y vida cotidiana. Asimetrías en el uso del tiempo y del espacio [The City and Everyday Life. Asymmetries in the Use of Time and Space], Córdoba, Red Mujer y Hábitat, pp. 16–52. (In Spanish)

5. Falú A., Segovia O. (eds.) (2007) Ciudades para convivir sin violencia contra las mujeres [Cities for Living Together Without Violence Against Women], Santiago de Chile, Ediciones Sur, 220 p. (In Spanish)

6. Fernández Castro J. (2011) Las formas de lo informal. Elementos de lectura, proyecto y gestión inclusiva desde la investigación proyectual [The forms of the informal. Elements of positioning, designing and inclusive management from design research], IX Jornadas de Sociología, Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 22 p. (In Spanish)

7. Fourier C. (1971) Design for Utopia: Selected Writings of Charles Fourier, Studies in the Libertarian and Utopian Tradition, New York, Schocken, 208 p.

8. Grabino V., Furtado V. (2018) Alertas feministas: lenguajes y estéticas de un feminismo desde el sur [Feminist alerts: languages and aesthetics of feminism from the South], Revista Observatorio latinoamericano y caribeño, Instituto de Estudios de América Latina y el Caribe (IEALC), no. 2–1, pp. 18–38. (In Spanish)

9. Gropius W. (1962) Scope of Total Architecture, New York, Collier Books, 158 p.

10. Heidegger M. (1994) Construir, habitar, pensar [Building, Dwelling, Thinking], in Conferencias y artículos, Barcelona, Serbal, 212 p. (In Spanish)

11. Jacobs J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York, Random House, 458 p.

12. Latour B. (2012) Enquete sur les modes d’existence. Une anthropologie des Modernes [An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns], Paris, La Découverte, 504 p. (In French)

13. Lefebvre H. (2001) Du rural à l’urbain [From Rural to Urban], Paris, Anthropos, 299 p. (In French)

14. Olivera М. (2006) Violencia Femicida: Violence Against Women and Mexico’s Structural Crisis, Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 33(2), pp. 104–114.

15. Roitman A. Spinelli S., Poza C. (2020) Politicas públicas y urbanismo feminista. Alcances de la Implementación de la Perspectiva de Género en el Planeamiento, la Gestión y el proyecto urbano [Public Policies and Feminist Urbanism. The Scope of the Implementation of the Gender Perspective in Planning, Management and Urban Design], Jornadas Anuales SI+, Herramientas y procedimientos [Annual Conferences SI+. Instruments and Procedures], Buenos Aires, la Universidad de Buenos Aires, pp. 35–60. (In Spanish)

16. Ruskin J. (1868) The Political Economy of Art. London, Smith, Elder & Company, 248 p.

17. Simone L.D. (2018) Mujeres y Ciudades. Urbanismo género-consciente, espacio público y aportes para la ciudad inclusiva desde un enfoque de derecho [Women and Cities, Gender-Conscious Urbanism, Public Space and Contributions to the Inclusive City from a RightsBased Approach], in Arce Riffo J. (ed.) El Estado y las mujeres: el complejo camino hacia una necesaria transformación de las instituciones, Ril Editores, pp. 229–250. (In Spanish)

18. Tabbush C., Caminotti M. (2015) Igualdad de género y movimientos sociales en la Argentina posneoliberal: la Organización Barrial Tupac Amaru [Gender Equality and Social Movements in Post-Neoliberal Argentina: the Tupac Amaru Neighbourhood Association], Perfiles latinoamericanos, Vol. 46, pp. 147–171. (In Spanish)