Brazil’s foreign policy and the eternal quest for Latin American integration

Brazil has historically been regarded as the natural leader of Latin America, given its level of development, the size of its economy, its military might and its ambitious foreign policy. This image was cemented during the presidencies of Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff, who supported Latin American integration (particularly via the creation of such blocs as UNASUR and CELAC) and diminishing Washington’s historical influence in the Western Hemisphere. However, the situation has dramatically changed with the rise to power of President Jair Bolsonaro, a staunch supporter of the US in general (and President Donald Trump in particular), which has affected Brazil’s role in the region. Based upon the analysis of specific domestic and foreign policy components, the author draws conclusions on how Brazil’s prospects as a participant (or even the key motivator) in the transformation processes in the region have changed. Brazil is no longer perceived as the axis of attempts at regional integration, but rather “just another separate state” taking care of its own interests. Brazil’s economic crisis and Bolsonaro’s strategy (or the lack thereof) regarding the COVID-19 pandemic have negatively affected Brazil’s image even further. Then again, as this analysis seeks to demonstrate, Latin America has a mixed record when it comes to integration attempts, as regional governments are zealous guardians of national sovereignty. Hence, while there have been some successful regional thrivings towards promoting cooperation, the rise of some supranationalist organization similar to the European Union – is a dream. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as Latin American (and Caribbean) blocs do not need supranationalism to be effective, but it shows the limits of regional integration initiatives.

1. Altmann Borbón, Josette. “Integración en América Latina: crisis de los modelos regionales y ausencia de certidumbres” [Integration in Latin America: crisis of regional models and lack of certainties]. In La integración latinoamericana: visiones regionales y subregionales [Latin American integration: regional and sub-regional visions], coordinated by Luis Guillermo Solis and Francisco Rojas Aravena, 309-324. San José: Flacso Andes, 2006. [In Spanish]

2. Casarões, Guilherme, and Daniel Flemes. “Brazil First, Climate Last – Bolsonaro’s Foreign Policy.” GIGA Focus 5 (September 2019).

3. Christensen, Steen Frbya. “Brazil’s Foreign Policy Priorities.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 2 (2013): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.775785.

4. La Integración en América Latina: Nuevos y Viejos Esquemas. Incertidumbres de Futuro [Integration in Latin America: new and old schemes. Uncertainties for the future], coordinated and elaborated by Mónica Colomer. Madrid: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación, 2015. https://www.aecid.es/Centro-Documentacion/Documentos/Eficacia%20y%20calidad/Documento%20de%20trabajo%207.pdf.

5. Lehmann, Kai Enno. “Can Brazil Lead? The Breakdown of Brazilian Foreign Policy and What it Means for the Region.” Rising Powers Quarterly 2, no. 2 (2017): 125–147.