Argentine-Brazilian contradictions as a factor of disintegration in South America

At the beginning of the 21st century, international relations in South America are developing in a paradigm of regionalization, manifested in emergence of multiple social associations on the continent, linked to each other not only geographically but also functionally. In parallel, trends of fragmentation and polarization, resulting from the crisis of Latin American multilateralism and from political heterogeneity established by the results of the next electoral period, are directly or indirectly influencing the nature of regional relations. In this context, and given their impact on regional affairs, the analysis of the current state of relations between Argentina and Brazil, characterized by polarized positions on a range of issues, deserves particular attention. The author chose a systemic approach to the analysis of international relations and the current foreign policy situation as the main methodological tool to achieve the goal of research. This, in turn, allowed the author of this article to consider South America as a regional subsystem, within which political systems and regimes compete, including for the choice of the vector of sub-regional development. The article demonstrates that recently the Argentine-Brazilian contradictions have fueled and strengthened political and ideological heterogeneity of the whole South American continent. In addition, the author cites different visions of formats and vectors of integration development of associations and subregional organizations in South America. According to the author, the actions of the governments of Alberto Fernández and Jair Bolsonaro make it quite difficult to implement and put in practice the necessary measures and formulated strategic goals, as well as to determine the vector of future development for Latin American states.

1. Iwanowski, Z.W. “Political polarization in Latin America.” Svobodnaja mysl’ 1 (2019): 149–168. [In Russian]

2. Kosevich, E.Yu. “Latin America: the coronavirus and the new political landscape.” Latinskaya Amerika 10 (2020): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0011330-2. [In Russian]

3. Kuznetsov, D.A. “Latin America in the 21st Century: Regional Development Trajectories.” Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics 2 (2020): 44–70. https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-2-44-70. [In Russian]

4. Lebedeva, M.M. “Modern Megatrends of World Politics.” World Economy and International Relations 9 (2019): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-29-37. [In Russian]

5. Pyatakov, A.N. “PROSUR – a new South American (des)integration mechanism?” Latinskaja Amerika 7 (2020): 15–36. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0009859-3. [In Russian]

6. Yakovleva, N.M. “Super cycle of elections in Latin America: Political trends.” Perspektivy. Elektronnyj zhurnal 13 (2018): 69–80. [In Russian]

7. Arévalo Parra, Juan Camilo. “Mercosur and the Brazilian Regional Strategic Vision, 2003-2010.” Revista CIFE: Lecturas de Economía Social 22, no. 36 (2020): 99–126. https://doi.org/10.15332/22484914/5439.

8. Caetano, Gerardo, and Nicolas Pose. “La debilidad de los regionalismos latinoamericanos frente a los escenarios actuales. Notas para el debate.” Documentos de Trabajo 41 (2020).

9. Costa Vaz, Alcides, and Tiago Soares Nogara. “Evolution and axes of contemporary Brazilian foreign policy.” In Anuario Internacional CIDOB 2020, edited by Francesc Fàbregues, and Oriol Farrés, 248–256. Barcelona: CIDOB, 2020. https://www.cidob.org/es/publicaciones/serie_de_publicacion/anuario_internacional_cidob/anuario_internacional_cidob_2020_nueva_epoca_perfil_de_pais_alemania.

10. Fernández, Elías. Presidencialismo y federalismo: articulación nación-provincias a propósito del aislamiento social, preventivo y obligatorio.” In El tiempo que vivimos. COVID 19 y su impacto en nuestras sociedades, coordinated by V. Gastón Mutti, 108–114. Santa Fe: Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario, 2020. http://grupomontevideo.org/sitio/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/El-tiempo-que-vivimos-final-3.pdf.

11. Jéifets, Lázar, and Kseniya Konoválova. “Historical logic of Argentine-Brazilian Relations: On the Confrontation between Jair Bolsonaro and Alberto Fernandez.” Iberoamérica 2 (2021): 192–213. https://doi.org/10.37656/s20768400-2021-2-09.

12. Malamud, Andres. “Presidential diplomacy and the institutional pillars of Mercosur: an empirical examination.” Relaciones Internacionales 15 (2010): 113–138.

13. Quitral, Máximo, and Jorge Riquelme. “The Latin-American integration in crisis. Some keys of context.” Aldea Mundo. Revista sobre Fronteras e Integración Regional 25, no. 49 (2020): 21–32.

14. Van Klaveren, Alberto. “The crisis of multilateralism and Latin America.” Ánalisis Carolina 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33960/AC_10.2020.