The concept of Buen Vivir in the context of green theory in international relations

The authors consider the peculiarities of emergence of Buen Vivir сoncept in the context of increasing importance of the environmental factor in international relations. The authors present the main ideas of this concept, which became a logical response to environmental challenges – first from the autonomous societies of Latin America, and then found its reflection at the state level in countries such as Ecuador and Bolivia. At the same time, for the first time in Russian historiography, we present an analysis of this concept connection to the development of such a direction in international relations as environmentalism, as well as what place it can occupy in the international relations theory. The main results of the research are as follows: 1) the role and significance of the environmental factor in modern IR is increasing, while politicization of environmental problems is observed; 2) the number of studies on topics related to environmentalism in IR is increasing, with them becoming one of the dominants of not only public, but also a research discourse; 3) the concept of sustainable development did not fully comply with existing demands, which predetermined the emergence in Latin America of a separate concept of development, with an emphasis on the environmental component, being a Latin American ‘response’ to the search of a model for regulating the relationship of mankind with the environment in order to preserve it; 4) the concept of Buen Vivir was most successfully implemented in Ecuador and Bolivia as these countries are home to a significant number of Native Indians, and their worldview is closely intertwined with the key ideas of the concept.

1. Bezerra, M. “Environment and national sovereignty. Brazil under threats.” International Affairs 10 (2020): 98–111. [In Russian]

2. Borzova, A.Y. “The Role of the Brazilian Cooperation Agency in Promoting South-South Cooperation.” International Organisations Research Journal 3 (2015): 156–169. [In Russian]

3. Bliznetskaya, E.A. “International Environmental Governance: Drivers and Perspectives.” MGIMO Review of International Relations 2 (2012): 147–155. [In Russian]

4. Boklan, D.S. “‘Ecologization’ of International Economic Relations in the Context of Evolution of Concept of Sustainable Development.” Moscow Journal of International Law 1 (2015): 117–134. [In Russian]

5. Vorotnikova, T.A “‘Suma qamaña’: Bolivia in Search of Alternative Model of Development.” Global South in the Polycentric World (Global Development) 19 (2018): 20–25. [In Russian]

6. Degterev, D.A. “Game-Theory Analysis of International Development Assistance Regimes.” MGIMO Review of International Relations 2 (2012): 47–58. [In Russian]

7. Kostogryzov, P.I. “The suma qamaña ideology in the values politics of Evo Morales’ left indigenist regime.” Perm University Herald. History 4 (2019): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2019-4-30-40. [In Russian]

8. Sudarev, V.P., ed. The ‘Left Turn’ in the Latin America. Moscow: ILA RAS, 2017. [In Russian]

9. Nekrasov, B.I. “The Evolution of the Cooperation between South American Countries in the Amazon Basin: From the Development of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty to the Signing of the Leticia Pact for the Amazon.” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 4 (2020): 805–822. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-4-809-826. [In Russian]

10. Pavlova, E.B. “Koncepcii “horoshej zhizni” v Bolivii i Ekvadore: rascvet i upadok normativnoj sily.” Latinskaya Amerika 3 (2016): 22–31. [In Russian]

11. Timofeeva, Y.A., Budykina, K.Y. “Amazon Wildfires and Mercosur–EU Relations.” Latinskaya Amerika 7 (2020): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044778X0009863-8. [In Russian]

12. Ursul, A.D. “Latin American vector of global sustainability acquisition.” World Politics 2 (2020): 102–115. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8671.2020.2.33376. [In Russian]

13. Caria, Sara, and Rafael Domínguez. “Ecuador’s Buen vivir: A New Ideology for Development.” Latin American perspectives 43 (2016): 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0094582X15611126.

14. Chassagne, Natasha. Buen Vivir as an alternative to sustainable development: Lessons from Ecuador. London: Routledge, 2020.

15. Chuji, Mónica, Grimaldo Rengifo, and Eduardo Gudynas. “Buen Vivir.” In Pluriverse. A Post-Development Dictionary, edited by Ashish Kothari et al., 111-114. New Delhi: Tulika, 2019.

16. Ilyín, I., and Ursul, A. “Dimensión global de la transición latinoamericana al desarrollo sostenible”. Iberoamérica 2 (2020): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.37656/s20768400-2020-2-01.

17. Friant, Martin Calisto. “The Buen Vivir: A policy to survive the Anthropocene?” Global policy 1 (2015): 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12187.

18. Lalander, Rickard. “Indigeneidad, descolonización y la paradoja del desarrollismo extractivista en el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.” Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política 1 (2017): 49-83. https://doi.org/10.7770/RCHDYCP-V8N1-ART1178.

19. Nietschmann, Bernard. “The Fourth World: nations versus states.” In Reordering the world: geopolitical perspectives on the twenty-first century, edited by George J. Demko and William B. Wood. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1994.

20. Quispe-Agnoli, Myriam, and Elena Whisler. “Official dollarization and the banking system in Ecuador and El Salvador.” Economic Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 3 (2006): 55–71.

21. Shellenberger, Michael, and Ted Nordhaus Break through: From the death of environmentalism to the politics of possibility. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.

22. Svampa, Maristella. “Modelo de Desarrollo y cuestión ambiental en América Latina: categorías y escenarios en disputa.” In El desarrollo en cuestión: Reflexiones desde América Latina, edited by Fernanda Wanderley. La Paz: CIDES–OXFAM, 2011.

23. Veltmeyer, Henry, and Edgar Zayago Lau, eds. Buen Vivir and the Challenges to Capitalism in Latin America. London: Routledge, 2020.