Peripheral realism of Carlos Escudé

In this article the author analyzes a theoretical direction called “Peripheral Realism”, which has arisen within the scope of neorealism in 1990s due to an acknowledged Argentinean political scientist Carlos Escudé. The author makes an attempt to provide a complex analysis of the original theory of 1992 and compares it with the modern realities of international relations. The author also conducts a comparative analysis of the original theory and its revised version of 2016, in order to trace the dynamics of its development. The main objective of the study is to establish whether the theory of peripheral realism can be attributed to the so-called ‘non-Western’ theories of international relations. First of all, the article is based on an in-depth analysis of the theoretical basis of Carlos Escudé’s peripheral realism theory on the basis of his main writings of 1992 and 1995, as well as an analysis of subsequent variations of the theory in 2012 and 2015. The study also uses a comparative analysis method, which contrasts the features and theoretical positions of the canonical ‘grand’ theories of international relations (especially realism and neo-realism, being the origins for the theory) and correlates them with those of the theory of peripheral realism in order to highlight the role and place of this theory in the configuration of Western and non-Western theories of international relations. The author concludes that the uniqueness of the concept comes from assessing reality from the point of ‘weaker’ and developing countries, which is not generally customary for Anglo-Saxon theories. This unique feature puts the concept of peripheral realism beyond the perceptions of the nature of world politics generally accepted in the research community. The study was originally drafted for the research seminar “Non-Western Theories of International Relations” of the Department of theory and history of international relations of RUDN University, as well as for the joint research seminar of RUDN and HSE University “Non-Western Theories of International Relations in a Polycentric World.”

1. Degterev, D.A., Ramich, M.S., Tsvyk, A.V. “U.S.−China: “Power Transition” and the Outlines of “Conflict Bipolarity”.” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 2 (2021): 210–231. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-2-210-231. [In Russian]

2. Eremin, A.A., Petrovich-Belkin, O.K. “Historic retrospective of the U.S. “War on Drugs” concept.” Voprosy Istorii 12-1 (2020): 267–287. https://doi.org/10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202012Statyi23. [In Russian]

3. Yakovlev, P.P. “Politika D. Trampa v Latinskoi Amerike: itogi i perspektivy.” Perspektivy. Elektronnyi zhurnal 3 (2020): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.32726/2411-3417-2020-3-52-65. [In Russian]

4. Bello, Iraxis, and Francisco J. Peñas “La teoría de Relaciones Internacionales en y desde el Sur.” Relaciones In ternacionales 22 (2013): 5–7.

5. Bernal-Meza, Raúl. “Latin American Concepts and Theories and Their Impacts on Foreign Policies." In Concepts, Histories and Theories of International Relations for the 21th Century, edited by J.F.S. Saraiva, 131-177. Brasilia: Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, 2009.

6. Buzan, Barry, and Amitav Acharya. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge, 2010.

7. Escudé, Carlos. Argentina: Paria Internacional? Buenos Aires: Editorial de Belgrano, 1984.

8. Escudé, Carlos. El realismo de los Estados débiles. Buenos Aires: GEL, 1995.

9. Escudé, Carlos. Foreign Policy Theory in Menem’s Argentina. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1997.

10. Escudé, Carlos. Realismo Periférico. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta, 1992.

11. Escudé, Carlos. Realism in the Periphery. In Routledge Handbook of Latin America in the World, edited by Jorge I. Domínguez, and Ana Cobarrubias, 45-57. New York: Routledge, 2015.

12. Frasson-Quenoz, Florent. “Latin American Thinking in International Relations Reloaded.” OASIS 23 (2016): 131–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n23.04.

13. Morgenthau, Hans. Politics among Nations. New York: Knopf, 1948.

14. Nye, Joseph, and Robert Keohane. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. New York: Little, Brown & Co, 1977.

15. Organski, A.F.K. World Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1958.

16. Schenoni, Luis, and Carlos Escudé. “Peripheral Realism Revisited.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600102.

17. Tickner, Arlene B., and Mônica Herz. “No place for theory? Security Studies in Latin America.” In Thinking International Relations Differently, edited by Arlene Tickner, and David L. Blaney, 92-115. London: Routledge, 2012.

18. Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hill, 1979.